If lately you have noticed a tendency toward negative feelings such as anxiety, depression, and self-doubt, I would recommend you try NuLeaf Naturals Multicannabinoid Full Spectrum Oil at: https://nuleafnaturals.com/product/full-spectrum-multicannabinoid-oil/

COVID-19 pandemic triggers SURPRISING changes in personality, new study suggests

 It seems that there is yet another thing that we can blame on COVID-19: a bad attitude. Or at least a worse one.

If you’ve noticed that people aren’t quite as nice as they used to be pre-pandemic, you’re in good company – and you may be picking up what the scientists are learning. A study by Angela Sutin of Florida State University College of Medicine indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic potentially altered people’s personalities worldwide.

How did the pandemic affect our personalities?
The Understanding America Study gathered data from 7,209 people and 18,623 assessments via online participation. The researchers compared five-factor model personality traits between May 2014 through February 2020, considered pre-pandemic, and March 2020 through December 2020, with some falling between 2021 and 2022, which were in the heat of the pandemic. Those traits were agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness.

The pre-pandemic and 2020 personality trait comparisons showed minimal changes, with a slight decline in neuroticism. Neuroticism is one of the top 5 personality traits, typically defined as a tendency toward negative feelings such as anxiety, depression, and self-doubt. On the other hand, in the 2021 through 2022 personality trait comparison to pre-pandemic personality traits, several marked differences were noted, including declines in agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and openness.

The personality declines noted were approximately one-tenth of a standard deviation. To put that into perspective, a one-tenth of a standard deviation is the equivalent of roughly a decade of normative personality.

Of these groups, young adults exhibited disruptive maturity, which included a decrease in conscientiousness and agreeableness and an increase in neuroticism. Conversely, the group comprised of the oldest adults in the study did not exhibit any significant increases or declines in personality traits.

Furthermore, the personality changes were minimal early in the pandemic but steadily and dramatically increased, beginning in 2021, with the most changes found in the group comprised of young adults. They became moodier, less trusting, less responsible, more prone to stress, less restrained, and less cooperative.

What about other stressful events?
Other studies have examined how personality traits can be affected by certain stressful events like hurricanes and earthquakes. But unfortunately, they have not found any link between the two. However, The COVID pandemic has spanned the entire world and touched almost every aspect of people’s lives.

This stressful event is much different from the rest.

So, what is the takeaway?
The COVID pandemic, whether you feel the reports of the so-called virus were inflated by the media or absolutely true, touched every single part of our lives. Stories from around the globe emerged daily, and there was really nowhere anyone could go to get away from it – and everyone felt the effects and is still feeling them.

The study’s authors concluded that when a stressful event affects an entire population, that personality is undoubtedly affected, particularly in younger adults. And those changes could become the new norm moving forward.

So it can be said that the COVID pandemic caused several changes in our world and our society, but it also caused a change in us and how we operate in the world. On a positive note, two of the best things you can do to improve your physical, mental and emotional well-being would be to turn off mainstream media news channels and eat a healthier, organic diet.

CITATION
(Woods, 2022). NaturalHealth365: COVID-19 pandemic triggers SURPRISING changes in personality, new study suggests. Retrieved on 11/04/22 online from https://www.naturalhealth365.com/covid-19-pandemic-triggers-surprising-changes-in-personality-new-study-suggests.html

AcuteShield Vanquish® Supports Vaccinated Health® with 10 ingredients that inhibit the spike proteins from attaching to body organ cells which is the root cause of most health issues being experienced by people who have been vaccinated.

ARTICLE

Swiss Study Shows Heart Injury in All mRNA Covid Jab Recipients, Myocarditis In 3%

There is now considerable evidence that mRNA gene therapies are routinely injuring the heart, with raised troponin levels across the board and subclinical myocarditis in up to one in 27 cases or more.

New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the hearts of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths.

The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8 percent showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.

The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-COVID condition rather than the vaccines.

However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART noted that even though Australia had not had significant COVID (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-COVID deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART noted that Australia “did not have prior COVID as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021.” Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe, and the USA.”

In New Zealand, economist John Gibson found a temporal association between boosters and excess deaths, estimating “16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses” (see below). He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis: “The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.”

In Japan, Guy Gin reports that Professor Seiji Kojima of Nagoya University found the same correlation during the booster rollout in January to March 2022 (see below) – a time when most excess deaths were not with COVID.

In Israel, a study in Nature observed a similar trend for 16–39 year-olds, with cardiac arrest emergency calls rising and falling with the first and second doses and then rising and falling again after doses for recovered individuals.

Dr. Eyal Shahar looked at the Israeli deaths data for all ages and estimated “a plausible range of the booster fatality rate in Israel in August 2021” of 8–17 deaths per 100,000 vaccinees. In the Netherlands, vaccinologist Dr. Theo Schetters estimated a booster fatality rate in the over-60s as high as 125 per 100,000 vaccinees.

As to cause, Dr. Michael Palmer and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi at Doctors for Covid Ethics have set out what they deem “irrefutable proof of causality” that mRNA vaccines are causing vascular and organ damage. From studies and autopsy evidence the medical experts show:
• mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site but instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs
• mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs
• Vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation
• Vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome

They explain that autopsy evidence shows that “the strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle after vaccination correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction.” They add that “vaccine-induced vascular damage will promote blood clotting, and clotting-related diseases such as heart attack, stroke, lung embolism are very common in the adverse events databases.”

A recent case report in Vaccines of an autopsy conducted on a 76-year-old man who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination confirmed the role of the vaccine. It found the presence of spike protein but not the nucleocapsid protein in the deceased man’s brain and heart, proving that the vaccine (which unlike the virus only produces the spike protein) was the cause of the deadly inflammation.

In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.

A case report of the autopsy of a 55-year-old patient who died four months after receiving a Pfizer jab as a second dose (his first dose was AstraZeneca) made similar findings.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, but not nucleocapsid protein, was sporadically detected in vessel walls by immunohistochemical assay. The cause of death was determined to be acute myocardial infarction and lymphocytic myocarditis. These findings indicate that myocarditis, as well as thrombo-embolic events following injection of spike-inducing gene-based vaccines, are causally associated with an injurious immunological response to the encoded agent.

A recent meta-analysis claimed to find that the risk of myocarditis is “more than seven-fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine”. It claims this supports “the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations.”

However, critics have pointed out the numerous flaws in this meta-analysis and highlighted that it is at odds with a major Nordic study of 23 million people that found the risk of hospitalization post-vaccination in 16–24 year old males was up to 28 times higher than the risk post-COVID. At The Daily Sceptic we have written about this Nordic study as well as a number of other studies with similar findings, including ones from France, England and the U.S. (alongside critiques of studies that purport to show otherwise). A study from Israel confirmed the elevated risk from vaccination, stating: “We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.” A study from Italy found a similar absence of elevated myocarditis during the pre-vaccination pandemic period.

We should also note that vaccination does not prevent COVID infection, so the risks are additive and the comparison between vaccination risk and infection risk is false. Cardiovascular injury also is not the only serious adverse event associated with these vaccines. A recent study by researchers from Harvard, Oxford, and Johns Hopkins University (among others) found that the mRNA vaccines are up to nearly 100 times more likely to cause a person of student age serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalized with COVID-19.

Most of these studies only look at clinical adverse events, i.e., events serious enough to warrant medical assistance. Studies are now emerging which show these clinical events to be just the tip of the iceberg of a far larger number of subclinical injuries. A study in Thailand found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers (29.2 percent) following Pfizer vaccination and subclinical heart inflammation in one in 43 (2.3%).

The Swiss study mentioned above was recently highlighted by Dr. Vinay Prasad and comes from the European Society of Cardiology. It confirms the Thai result, finding at least 2.8 percent with subclinical myocarditis (possibly more as the researchers excluded half the cases as possibly from another cause). Prasad observed that this means subclinical myocarditis is hundreds of times (“two orders of magnitude”) more common than clinical myocarditis. The rates were highest in women at 3.7 percent, which is one in 27 vaccinated. (Prasad noted that this is different to the Thai study, which found the usual higher rates in males; he suggested this may be related to how the researchers excluded cases).

Crucially, the study found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people (see chart above, where the dark lines being shifted to the right of the fainter control group lines implies elevated levels throughout the vaccinated population). This indicates the vaccine is routinely injuring the heart (an organ which does not heal well) and that the known injuries are just the more severe instances of a far larger number occurring right across the board.

These injuries are not necessarily short and over with quickly. Studies have shown that spike protein is still being found in the blood of many vaccinated people at least four months after vaccination, suggesting it is still being produced in some way. The mechanism of this long-term production of spike protein by the body has not been identified (is the genetic code being incorporated into the cell’s DNA?). But if cells in the cardiovascular system and elsewhere are still producing this pathogenic and inflammatory protein for months on end, the risk of auto-immune injury, as identified in the autopsies above, greatly increases. Such an auto-immune injury may be triggered by re-challenge by the virus ramping up the immune response to the spike protein, which may explain why excess non-COVID deaths often accompany COVID waves.

There is now considerable evidence that mRNA vaccines are routinely injuring the heart, with raised troponin levels across the board and subclinical myocarditis in up to one in 27 cases or more. These are not rare events, as is often claimed by medical authorities and in the media. They are alarmingly common.

Citation:
(Jones, 2022). Life Site: Swiss study shows heart injury in all mRNA COVID jab recipients, myocarditis in 3%. Retrieved on 11/04/22 online from https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/swiss-study-shows-heart-injury-in-all-mrna-covid-jab-recipients-myocarditis-in-3/

Military Doctors: DoD Medical Data Shows 300% Increase In Cancer, Miscarriages, Infertility After Jab Approved

Matt Agorist / January 29, 2022

According to the US military, the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s (AFHSB) “web-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS).” It contains every International Classification of Diseases (ICD) medical billing codes for any medical diagnosis in the military submitted for medical insurance billing. Because it is a closed system for the DoD, the data within DMED is highly accurate which is why the following information is incredibly shocking.

According to three military doctors who have come forward, after the approval of the covid-19 vaccine, the data shows that in the first 11 months of 2021, military members experienced a sudden and shocking spike in nearly every ICD code associated with common vaccine injuries.

On Monday, during a 5-hour long hearing on a “Covid-19: Second Opinion,” held by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Ohio attorney Thomas Renz presented the DMED data. The numbers are incredibly shocking.

Conservative pundit Daniel Horowitz detailed some of the issues on Twitter after he interviewed Renz.

“I know 2 of the 3 cited whistleblowers. Their credentials are impeccable. Lt. Col. Chambers is one of the only Green Beret doctors in the military.“

“Unlike VAERS where the naysayers can suggest that anyone can submit, this is only by military doctors and quantifies every single ICD code in the military for tri care billing of Humana. This is the ultimate defined and finite population with excellent surveillance.”

While correlation doesn’t necessary equate to causation, the number of young and healthy military members coming down with these ailments — as shown in their own data — is a massive red flag and should warrant immediate investigation. Yet the establishment media have completely ignored it.

Watch for yourself below.

Attorney Thomas Renz reveals what multiple DoD whistleblowers have provided on the safety signals they are seeing

These numbers are mind blowing! @SenRonJohnson pic.twitter.com/gs4fhwF1Po

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) January 24, 2022

“We have substantial data showing that we saw, for example, miscarriages increasing by 300% over the five-year average, almost. We saw almost 300% increase in cancer over the five-year average,” Renz said.

“We saw, this one’s amazing, neurological. So, neurological issues which would affect our pilots, over 1000% increase. 1000,” Renz continued.

The data was apparently so shocking that Johnson interrupted Renz, confirming, “Ten times”?

“That’s ten times the rate.” Renz affirmed, and pointed out that they saw an increase of “82,000 neurological issues per year to 863,000 in one year.”

That is not all either. According to Renz, the three military doctors, Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long have declared under penalty of perjury that these numbers are across the board in multiple disorders. Horowitz explains:

Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:

• Myocardial infarction –269% increase
• Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
• Congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
• Female infertility – 471% increase
• Pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase

In the sworn declaration, one of the doctors is quoted, saying, “It is my professional opinion that the major increases incidences of the above discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.’”

As stated above, however, correlation does not equal causation, but even when we remove any mention of the vaccine, the sheer spike in ailments affecting normally young and healthy military service men and women should have set off a flare within the DoD and the establishment in general. Yet it’s crickets… everywhere. (Agorist, 2022).

SECOND CONFIRMATION THAT THESE NUMBERS ARE ACCURATE

Leigh Dundas, Human Rights Attorney
Just a few months ago Jonathon Otto interviewed Leigh Dundas, a powerful human rights attorney, who revealed how the military uses a database to record EVERY single medical issue that soldiers experience.

And what the Department of Defense (DOD) database showed directly after the vaxx rollout to soldiers in the military is chilling…

“They had looked at the DOD database and they recognized that over the preceding 5 years, all of the incidents of disease and problems medically in the military combined totaled about 1.7 million cases per year, on average… And that was true all the way through even the C0V!D year of 2020.

And then they introduced the vaccine to our armed forces in January of 2021… And when these doctors looked in the database, just in the first 9 or 10 months, so the first 3 quarters really, not even a full year, the incidents of disease… had gone from 1.7 million on average, to 22 million almost. It was a 20 million increase. It was out of this world statistical hike in the rate of disease in the U.S. military.” – Leigh Dundas

Citation:

(Agorist, 2022). The Washington Standard: Military Doctors: DoD Medical Data Shows 300% Increase In Cancer, Miscarriages, Infertility After Jab Approved. Retrieved on 10/31/22 online from Military Doctors: DoD Medical Data Shows 300% Increase in Cancer, Miscarriages, Infertility After Jab Approved – The Washington Standard