COVID-19 | Page 12 of 22 | Plant Meds RX Blog

11/Dec/22

SPIKE-PROTEINS-ADMINISTERED-INTRAVENOUSLY-ARE-ENGINEERED.jpg

A study from Nature Neuroscience finds the S1 spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice and can cause damage to the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. The spike protein is readily cleared from the blood and taken up by peripheral tissues. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was recovered from cerebrospinal fluid, proving it can cross the blood–brain barrier.

The study shows that these new spike proteins have been engineered to exploit angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), allowing for increased intake of spike proteins into the lungs and specifically to the brain. This is why a real case of SARS-CoV-2 can cause symptoms in the central nervous system, include changes to taste and smell, headaches, twitching, seizures, confusion, vision impairment, nerve pain, dizziness, impaired consciousness, nausea, hemiplegia, ataxia, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage.

So why are people going along with these new “vaccines” — if they turn their own cells into spike protein factories?

Intravenous administration of spike proteins concentrates in the brain TEN times greater than nasal exposure

The engineered SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to human cells using its S1 sub-unit. The researchers reveal that the S1 sub-unit was readily taken up in the parenchymal brain space, the hippocampus, the olfactory bulb, and was measured in eleven regions of the brain. When the spike proteins were administered intravenously, they concentrated in the brain TEN TIMES greater than when administered intranasally!

These are the same spike proteins that human cells are forced to translate, synthesize and replicate using the genetic instructions provided by new mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectored vaccines. The lab-engineered spike protein that is being mass produced in human cells is not only subverting the natural genetic template of protein synthesis, but it is also inundating the brain with foreign TOXINS.

The research finds that spike proteins readily cross the blood-brain barrier through a process called adsorptive transcytosis. Transcytosis is a type of trans-cellular transport in which various macro-molecules are transported across the interior of a cell. Adsorptive-mediated transcytosis provides a means for brain delivery of medicines across the blood-brain barrier.

Why are the spike proteins designed to readily adsorb across the blood brain barrier? Could this mode of action be intended to deliver other medicines and chemicals, genetic instructions or autoimmune attacks to the brain cells? Is this the real reason for encephalitis and brain hemorrhage following both infection and vaccination? What are the ramifications of spike proteins accumulating in the brain? Will recently vaccinated persons suffer acute or permanent brain damage from these experimental injections?

The research also showed that inflammation increases spike protein uptake in the brain and lungs. When the animals were induced with inflammation, the intravenously administered spike proteins entered the brain more readily. People who eat a plant-based, anti-inflammatory diet are more equipped to survive spike protein attacks to the brain.

Engineering coronavirus spike proteins for human experimentation and vaccine development

Naturally occurring coronaviruses were first identified in the mid-1960s. They are named after the crown-like spikes on their surface. These viruses are prevalent in animals; however, four coronaviruses are known to infect humans, including 229E, NL63, OC43, HKU1. All of these strains cause mild, cold-like symptoms in humans.

In the twenty-first century, scientists have been studying and engineering the coronavirus spike protein. Scientists can splice genes into the coronavirus spike protein, allowing natural selection to rapidly mutate the spike protein in the lab, one gene at a time. This serial passage technique hides any trace of human interference, but the advanced attachment properties of the resulting virus are a dead give-way that the virus was manipulated in a lab. This controversial gain-of-function research was banned in the US in 2004 but continued to take place in the US and abroad — as long as the research was conducted to invent new vaccines. Today, new experimental vaccines are being unleashed, as the outbreaks occur in real time.

Since coronavirus gain-of-function research began, three new coronaviruses have emerged, causing severe illness in humans. SARS-CoV-1 was first identified in China in 2003; MERS-CoV was first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012; and today’s SARS-CoV-2, was first identified in Wuhan, nearby the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

Beijing researchers affiliated with the Academy of Military Medical Science published a study in June 2020, explaining the methods they used to modify coronavirus spike proteins to exploit human lung cells. The researchers equipped mice with the ACE2 receptor from human lung cells. By exploiting the ACE2 receptor, the spike protein is engineered to attack the brain and lungs of humans. The damage of this laboratory-leak vaccine experiment will only continue as new vaccine experiments go live on the population, translating spike proteins in human cells and attacking human brains into the unforeseeable future.

AcuteShield Vanquish® ingredients inhibit mRNA Spike Proteins from attaching to body organ cells (heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, liver, ovaries, etc.), some can cross the blood brain barrier to protect the brain and central nervous system, and some can penetrate cell membranes to inhibit spike protein replication. https://acuteshield.com

Citation

(Johnson, 2021). News Target: Spike proteins administered intravenously are engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier, can cause cerebral hemorrhage. Retrieved on 12/11/22 online from https://newstarget.com/2021-06-03-spike-proteins-engineered-to-cross-blood-brain-barrier.html

29/Nov/22

11/28/2022 / By Olivia Cook

A study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revealed that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines increase the risk of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) by 13,200 percent.

It examined the effects of vaccination using the mRNA COVID-19 injections from Pfizer and Moderna, based on the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The cases were then cross-checked to match the CDC’s definition of myocarditis. A total of 1,626 cases of myocarditis had been examined.

According to CDC researchers, 105.9 myocarditis cases per million doses were recorded in the 16- to 17-year-old male cohort injected with the second dose. The 12- to 15-year-old male cohort, meanwhile, recorded 70.7 myocarditis cases per million doses following the second vaccine shot. Moreover, the 18- to 24-year-old male cohort also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both the Pfizer (52.4 cases per million) and Moderna (56.3 cases per million) vaccines. (Related: Large Nordic study finds that mRNA COVID vaccines increase risk of myocarditis.)

The study authors ultimately concluded that the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines should be considered in the context of the supposed “benefits” of vaccination.

The public health agency, however, has doubled down on its insistence that adverse reactions after vaccination are rare.

“COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, and severe reactions after vaccination are rare,” said the CDC. “Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination responded well to medication and rest and felt better quickly”.

The agency also pointed out that “reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare,” and that “reports of adverse events, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.”

McCullough: Post-vaccination reports of myocarditis are far from rare
Texas-based cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, however, disagreed with the notion of myocarditis being a “rare” adverse event.

“In cardiology, we spend our entire career trying to save every bit of heart muscle. We put in stents, we do heart catheterization, we do stress tests, we do CT angiograms. The whole game of cardiology is to preserve heart muscle,” McCullough said in a statement to the Epoch Times.

“Under no circumstances would we accept a vaccine that causes even one person to sustain heart damage. Not one. And this idea that ‘Oh, we’re going to ask a large number of people to sustain heart damage for some other theoretical benefit for a viral infection,’ which for most is less than a common cold, is untenable. The benefits of the vaccines in no way outweigh the risks.”

Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has started active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available.

Meanwhile, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology have advised that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after a normal ECG and other test results are obtained. They have also advised that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.

Watch Dr. Peter McCullough explain how the mRNA COVID-19 injections cause myocarditis below:

23/Nov/22

OUTRAGEOUS! FDA BACKTRACKS DURING TRIAL AND NOW CLAIMS ‘NOT TAKING IVERMECTIN FOR COVID-19’ WAS MERELY A RECOMMENDATION

In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin that “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.

This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015 and the drug was praised in several scientific journals.

FDA SCARES OFF AMERICANS FROM TAKING “HORSE DRUG” IVERMECTIN FOR COVID — BUT PUSHED THE DRUG ON AFRICAN MIGRANTS IN 2015

There have been over 93 scientific studies on Ivermectin that showed significant benefits in treating COVID-19 in its early stages. The science is undeniable.

Despite this the US government condemned its use for COVID-19.

Fast forward to today…

During a recent hearing, government lawyers argued that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was only giving advice and it was not mandatory when it told people to “stop” taking Ivermectin for COVID-19.

The Nov. 1 hearing in federal court in Texas was for a complaint made by three doctors who claim the FDA’s statements on ivermectin, an anti-parasitic that has shown positive benefits in some trials against COVID-19, violated their constitutional right to practice medicine, Epoch Times reported.

“The cited statements were not directives,” said Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers. “They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”

“They use informal language, that is true… It’s conversational but not mandatory,” he continued.

The FDA has approved Ivermectin for use in other vector-borne diseases, but not for COVID-19. The Food and Drug Administration warned the public via its Twitter account that Ivermectin is only safe for use in horses but not for human intake against Covid-19.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the caption reads.

A second post stated: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

The lawsuit claims that FDA actions violated the law by interfering with the doctors’ ability to practice medicine and used the wonder drug “Ivermectin” against Covid-19.

It asked the court to declare the FDA’s actions unlawful and prevent the agency from issuing directives or opinions on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

The three plaintiffs in the case are Dr. Paul Marik of Virginia, Dr. Mary Bowden of Texas, and Dr. Robert Apter of Arizona.

“Can you understand the toll that that takes that I have young patients – young patients in the 30s and 40s, who I had to watch die – while the hospital prevented me from giving them the treatment I thought was in their best interest,” says Dr. Marik in 2021.

Houston Methodist health officials began investigating and suspended Dr. Mary Bowden last year for spreading “dangerous misinformation” about Covid-19 and promoting the efficacy of ivermectin, all because of FDA’s opinion.

The Nobel prize-winning, anti-parasitic drug, which has been deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases, is far safer than the potentially lethal, experimental Covid vaccines, the Texas doctor argued.

Dr. Meryl Nass, a Maine doctor with more than 40 years of experience cannot practice after her medical license was suspended for ‘spreading Covid misinformation’ and treating Covid patients with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.

Dr. Meryl Nass was also ordered to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation because of her action, all because of FDA’s opinion on Ivermectin and HCQ.

Ivermectin was first identified in the 1970s during a veterinary drug screening project at Merck Pharmaceuticals and has been used since then without any adverse events.

For almost three years, The Gateway Pundit has been reporting about the efficacy of Ivermectin and HCQ in treating COVID-19.

There have now been 187 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, 138 peer-reviewed, and 93 comparing treatment and control groups that show a 62% improvement for early treatment in COVID patients. Ivermectin was adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations).

A citywide prevention program using ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina between July 2020 and December 2020.

According to this comprehensive study, the regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates. The ivermectin non-users were two times more likely to die of COVID-19 than ivermectin users in the overall population analysis.

Earlier this year, Project Veritas released never before seen military documents regarding the origins of Covid-19, gain-of-function research, vaccines, potential treatments, and the government’s effort to conceal everything.

The documents contained evidence that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were effective in treating the coronavirus. This information was hidden from the American public.

Hal Turner Show reported:

DOCUMENTS STORED ON A TOP SECRET FOLDER ON THE COMPUTERS OF THE DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY (DARPA) PROVE THAT THE MEDICINES IVERMECTIN, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND INTERFERON WERE PROVEN “CURATIVE” OF COVID-19 IN APRIL 2020 – THE CURES WERE BURIED AS “TOP SECRET.”

THE REVELATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, SNEAKILY STORED IN A TOP SECRET FOLDER ON GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS PROVE THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES KNEW IN APRIL, 2020, THE ENTIRE “COVID-19 PANDEMIC” WAS COMPLETELY CURABLE THROUGH THE USE OF THESE COMMON MEDICATIONS.

HERE ARE EXCERPTS.

Heads should roll over this disclosure. (Survival, 2022).

LAWSUIT TO STOP RETALIATION BY MEDICAL SPECIALTY BOARDS FILED BY AAPS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation (AAPS) filed a lawsuit today in the federal Southern District of Texas, against three medical special boards for their threatened retaliation against physicians who speak out on matters of public concern. AAPS stands up for First Amendment rights of physicians who, like all American citizens, should be able to speak publicly without risk of retaliation.

“Our freedoms depend on the ability of physicians and all Americans to speak out on important issues of our day,” said Andrew Schlafly, who filed this lawsuit. “Entities holding monopolies over board certification should not be retaliating against good physicians.”

This new lawsuit asserts that “Defendants wrongly misuse their authority in a politically partisan manner to chill speech critical of positions taken by Dr. Anthony Fauci, lockdowns, mask mandates, Covid vaccines and even abortion.” This Complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief against several specialty Board Defendants that hold monopolies over board certification, and against the federal government for its newly created Disinformation Governance Board.

“Although only official state medical boards have the proper authority to regulate the practice of medicine, certifications by the Board Defendants constitute a de facto essential credential for practicing in most hospitals or participating in most networks,” this lawsuit asserts. “By threatening to revoke board certification of physicians, the Board Defendants improperly chill speech by physicians without the political accountability of official state medical boards,” this Complaint adds.

The Board Defendants are the American Board of Internal Medicine, the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and the American Board of Family Medicine. Each of these entities, which hold monopolies over board certification in their specialties, have declared their plans to discipline physicians who speak out.

“Criticizing Dr. Anthony Fauci should not be a basis for retaliating against a physician for speaking his mind,” Andrew Schlafly states. The lawsuit points out that many Republican senators properly rebuked Dr. Fauci for his statements that “I represent science” and that those who criticize him “are really criticizing science.” The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation is a national organization that co-sponsors conferences and funds scholarships for attendance by medical students and residents. (AAPS, 2022).

THE FDA MISLED THE PUBLIC ABOUT IVERMECTIN AND SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE IN COURT, ARGUES THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS (AAPS)

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
September 30, 2022
TUCSON, Ariz., Sept. 30, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its motion and amicus brief Thursday evening with the federal district court in Galveston urging it to allow the lawsuit to proceed against the FDA for its misleading statements against ivermectin. In Apter v. HHS, a group of physicians sued to hold the Food and Drug Administration, a federal agency within the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), accountable for its interference with physicians’ ability to treat Covid-19.

“Defendant FDA has improperly exploited misunderstandings about the legality and prevalence of off-label uses of medication, in order to mislead courts, state medical boards, and the public into thinking there is anything improper about off-label prescribing,” AAPS writes in its amicus brief to the court. “Not only is off-label prescribing fully proper, legal, and commonplace, but it is also absolutely necessary in order to give effective care to patients.”

Yet the FDA published multiple statements and sent letters to influential organizations to falsely disparage ivermectin, implying that it was not approved for treating Covid-19. Many, including courts and state medical boards, were misled by the FDA into thinking that its lack of approval for this treatment meant that ivermectin should not be used to treat Covid-19.

“It has never been proper for the FDA to interfere with that essential part of the practice of medicine, and the FDA knows it,” AAPS informed the court. The FDA “insisted and continues to insist on interfering with the prescription of this safe medication by physicians in treating Covid-19,” AAPS added.

AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly pointed out to the court that the FDA “has engaged in a campaign of interference with the proper use by physicians of ivermectin, which has long been approved as fully safe for human use.” He alerted the court that once the FDA approves a medication as safe, then physicians have full authority to prescribe it to treat any illness, particularly a novel virus like Covid-19.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto (everything for the patient). (Orient, 2022).

CITATIONS
(Survival, 2022). Survival Magazine: Outrageous! FDA Backtracks During Trial and Now Claims ‘Not Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19’ was Merely a Recommendation. Retrieved on 11/23/22 online from https://survivalmagazine.org/news/outrageous-fda-backtracks-during-trial-and-now-claims-not-taking-ivermectin-for-covid-19-was-merely-a-recommendation/

(AAPS, 2022). Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation: Lawsuit to Stop Retaliation by Medical Specialty Boards Filed by AAPS Educational Foundation. Retrieved on 11/23/22 online from https://aapsonline.org/lawsuit-to-stop-retaliation-by-medical-specialty-boards-filed-by-aaps/

(Orient, 2022). Yahoo: Outrageous! FDA Backtracks During Trial and Now Claims ‘Not Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19’ was Merely a Recommendation – Survival Magazine & News – Bushcraft Prepper Offgrid SHTF Blog & Conservative News. Retrieved on 11/23/22 online from https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/fda-misled-public-ivermectin-accountable-144900899.html

20/Nov/22

DATA PFIZER DIDN’T WANT YOU TO SEE

When a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency asked Pfizer to share the raw data from their COVID vaccine trials and post-marketing surveillance that was used to license the injection, the pharma giant linked up with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to refuse the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

In fact, the FDA (meant to serve and protect public health) hired Justice Department lawyers and went to court to shield the pharmaceutical giant from having to reveal its data – for 55 years. That’s right. The FDA and Pfizer did not want anyone to see the numbers behind their COVID vaccine until 2076.

Fortunately, a judge ruled that the FDA and Pfizer would have to answer their FOIA requests. Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021.

It reveals that the drug behemoth received more than 150,000 serious adverse event reports within three months of rolling out its COVID shot, but here we will focus on Table 6 of the data on pregnant and lactating women who received the shots in the first few months of the rollout, which began December 11. Most of these women would have been healthcare workers because that was who the first rounds of shots went to. As the clinical trials preceding the rollout excluded pregnant women, these would have been the first pregnant and lactating women to have ever received the vaccines.

Table 6 states that of 270 “unique pregnancies” that were exposed to the vaccine, “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”
This leaves 32 pregnancies with known outcomes.

Pfizer’s report states that there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death.

Pfizer’s report states that there were five pregnancies with “outcome pending” as well as the 238 with “no outcome provided.” But 32 minus 28 equals four, not five.

Because of this confusion, I called Pfizer and emailed questions to their media rep. Were 28 of 32 known pregnancy outcomes actually fatal in the first 10 weeks that the vaccine became available, as their report suggests? That’s an 87.5% pregnancy loss rate? And only one pregnancy outcome was “normal”? Please correct me if I’m wrong about this.

No reply.

The FDA would have had these data in their hands by the end of April. Maybe this is why they wanted to hide it for 55 years?
Ordinarily, when a new drug or medical device is put into action, the onus is, and should be, on the drug maker to prove that any unexpected events that occur afterwards are not related to the product. “All spontaneous reports have an implied causal relationship as per regulatory guidance, regardless of the reporter’s assessment,” according to adverse event reporting guidelines. But Pfizer and the FDA ignored events with temporal association and plausible cause for injury and have blithely declared the vaccine “safe and effective” for pregnant women.

Allowed it to be mandated, even.

Canadian stillbirth reports
In Canada, there have been whistleblower reports claiming spiking stillborn death rates after COVID injections. A retired doctor in British Columbia, Dr. Mel Bruchet, claimed in November that he was told by doulas that there had been 13 stillbirths in a 24-hour period at the Lion’s Gate Hospital in Vancouver. A grandmother whose grandbaby was stillborn at the hospital tweeted November 21: “My daughter got that damned poison vaccine one month ago because she couldn’t go to a restaurant, and people were freaking out because that she was unvaxxed. I want to sue the government.” The message was scrubbed from Twitter.

Dr. Daniel Nagase, an Alberta doctor who was ordered to leave his Alberta hospital for treating three COVID patients (all of whom who went home from hospital alive) with ivermectin, told a reporter that he had been informed of 86 stillbirths in Waterloo, Ontario between January and July.

“Normally, it’s only five or six stillbirths every year. So, about one stillbirth every two months is the usual rate,” he said. “So, to suddenly get to 86 stillbirths in six months, that’s highly unusual. But, the most important confirmation that we have from the Waterloo, Ontario report was that all of the [mothers of the] 86 stillbirths were fully vaccinated.”

VigiBase data
Given the high numbers of doses given, the number of adverse events continues to climb. VigiBase, the database of the World Health Organization, reports pregnancy complications including:
• 3,952 spontaneous abortions
• 353 fetal deaths
• 189 missed abortions
• 166 premature labours
• 160 premature babies
• 154 abortions
• 150 slow movement of unborn baby
• 146 hemorrhages in pregnancy
• 132 premature deliveries
• 123 fetal growth restriction
• 120 stillbirths
• 105 ectopic pregnancies
• 90 pre-eclampsia

(Global Research, 2022)

STILLBIRTHS ARE SKYROCKETING IN THE POST-COVID VACCINATION ERA

Stillbirths are skyrocketing in the post-covid vaccination era, leaked hospital email reveals.

An employee at a hospital in Fresno, Calif., leaked an email to the media showing that stillbirth rates have been spiking ever since the introduction of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.”

In August of this year, there were 22 stillbirths at the facility, the email revealed. And the trend is only expected to continue, it went on to state. (Related: Some of Canada’s most-vaccinated areas saw a 28-fold increase in stillbirths due to covid injections.)

So far in September, there have been seven stillbirths, though at the time of reporting only eight days had passed in the month.

Extrapolated to October, we would expect the total number of stillbirths at the hospital in September to be around 40, or more than twice that of August.

Prior to Operation Warp Speed, the average number of stillbirths per month at the hospital in question was less than one. Only about two deaths every three months were reported at the facility prior to the rollout of Fauci Flu shots.

The Epoch Times, which was among the first to obtain the email in question, reached out to the head nurse who sent the email for clarification. No response was received as of this writing.

As many as 28 out of 29 pregnant women who get “vaccinated” lose their babies.

According to Dr. James Thorpe, a Florida physician who specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, the contents of the leaked email are consistent with the findings of more than 1,300 peer-reviewed papers that have been published in the last 15 months.

Severe complications and death are both common outcomes post-injection for the Chinese Flu. Only a fraction of these cases appears in the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), however.

“This shot was designed to cross into the ovary; this shot was designed to cross into the brain barrier. This shot was designed to go everywhere,” revealed Dr. Chris Alan Shoemaker in a powerful speech on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada.

“And that’s why people are dying in such strange circumstances, unexplained circumstances, and the numbers are horrific. Sixty-seven percent of people who get the vaccine while pregnant lose the pregnancy.”

It turns out that Pfizer’s own internal documentation shows that the figure is even higher, with 28 out of 29 pregnant women losing their babies after getting jabbed for the Wuhan Flu.

This is why Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi has repeatedly warned pregnant women against taking the vaccine(s). To do so is to basically have a death wish for the baby since the chances of stillbirth are exceptionally high.

“The vaccine package insert from Biotech even says that pregnant women aren’t allowed to be vaccinated because vaccine injury cannot be ruled out,” Bhakdi says. “And if a young woman decides to get vaccinated, she should avoid becoming pregnant for two months.”

Despite the warnings, many pregnant women have gone ahead and gotten injected anyway, resulting in many additional stillbirths and the needless suffering associated with this tragic loss of unborn human life.

“They knew and they did nothing about it,” wrote a commenter. “They knew the clot shot didn’t stop transmission and they lied. Biden lied and millions died or will die.”

“All the grandstanding and ostracization of those who were skeptical and smart. All the relatives who mocked and shamed their children into getting it. They have no shame. They think we’ll forget. I for one will never forget.”

Another pointed out that these revelations are why some, including Emily Oster of The Atlantic, are now calling for covid “amnesty” – because they know We the People want not just answers but justice for these crimes against humanity. (Huff, 2022).

Plant Meds RX Note:

AcuteShield Vanquish® Supports Vaccinated Health®
This advanced scientific formula ingredients have been shown to inhibit mRNA spike proteins from attaching to body organ cells (one of which are ovaries), penetrating cell membranes, inhibiting replication inside the cells, supports mitochondria wellbeing, and some can cross the blood brain barrier to support the central nervous system.

Citation
(Global Research, 2022). Retrieved on 11/20/22 online from https://www.globalresearch.ca/foia-docs-reveal-pfizer-shot-caused-avalanche-miscarriages-stillborn-babies/5767537

(Huff, 2022). Vaccine Deaths:Stillbirths are skyrocketing in the post-covid vaccination era, leaked hospital email reveals. Retrieved on 11/20/22 online from https://www.vaccinedeaths.com/2022-11-04-stillbirths-increasing-post-covid-vaccination-era.html

Newer Posts

Older Posts

Blog: COVID & mRNA Vaccine News

SPIKE PROTEINS ADMINISTERED INTRAVENOUSLY ARE ENGINEERED TO CROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER, CAN CAUSE CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE

CDC STUDY: COVID-19 MRNA SHOTS INCREASE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS BY 13,200%

OUTRAGEOUS! FDA NOW CLAIMS ‘NOT TAKING IVERMECTIN FOR COVID-19’ WAS MERELY A RECOMMENDATION

OUTRAGEOUS! FDA BACKTRACKS DURING TRIAL AND NOW CLAIMS ‘NOT TAKING IVERMECTIN FOR COVID-19’ WAS MERELY A RECOMMENDATION

LAWSUIT TO STOP RETALIATION BY MEDICAL SPECIALTY BOARDS FILED BY AAPS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

THE FDA MISLED THE PUBLIC ABOUT IVERMECTIN AND SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE IN COURT, ARGUES THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS (AAPS)

STILLBIRTHS ARE SKYROCKETING IN THE POST-COVID VACCINATION ERA

DATA PFIZER DIDN’T WANT YOU TO SEE

John Plays Guitar

New Scientific Research Has Shown Ivermectin Can Treat Cancer Effectively

mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Pose Grave Public Health Risks