Mark Fluga, Author at Plant Meds RX Blog

11/Dec/22

SPIKE-PROTEINS-ADMINISTERED-INTRAVENOUSLY-ARE-ENGINEERED.jpg

A study from Nature Neuroscience finds the S1 spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice and can cause damage to the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. The spike protein is readily cleared from the blood and taken up by peripheral tissues. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was recovered from cerebrospinal fluid, proving it can cross the blood–brain barrier.

The study shows that these new spike proteins have been engineered to exploit angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), allowing for increased intake of spike proteins into the lungs and specifically to the brain. This is why a real case of SARS-CoV-2 can cause symptoms in the central nervous system, include changes to taste and smell, headaches, twitching, seizures, confusion, vision impairment, nerve pain, dizziness, impaired consciousness, nausea, hemiplegia, ataxia, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage.

So why are people going along with these new “vaccines” — if they turn their own cells into spike protein factories?

Intravenous administration of spike proteins concentrates in the brain TEN times greater than nasal exposure

The engineered SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to human cells using its S1 sub-unit. The researchers reveal that the S1 sub-unit was readily taken up in the parenchymal brain space, the hippocampus, the olfactory bulb, and was measured in eleven regions of the brain. When the spike proteins were administered intravenously, they concentrated in the brain TEN TIMES greater than when administered intranasally!

These are the same spike proteins that human cells are forced to translate, synthesize and replicate using the genetic instructions provided by new mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectored vaccines. The lab-engineered spike protein that is being mass produced in human cells is not only subverting the natural genetic template of protein synthesis, but it is also inundating the brain with foreign TOXINS.

The research finds that spike proteins readily cross the blood-brain barrier through a process called adsorptive transcytosis. Transcytosis is a type of trans-cellular transport in which various macro-molecules are transported across the interior of a cell. Adsorptive-mediated transcytosis provides a means for brain delivery of medicines across the blood-brain barrier.

Why are the spike proteins designed to readily adsorb across the blood brain barrier? Could this mode of action be intended to deliver other medicines and chemicals, genetic instructions or autoimmune attacks to the brain cells? Is this the real reason for encephalitis and brain hemorrhage following both infection and vaccination? What are the ramifications of spike proteins accumulating in the brain? Will recently vaccinated persons suffer acute or permanent brain damage from these experimental injections?

The research also showed that inflammation increases spike protein uptake in the brain and lungs. When the animals were induced with inflammation, the intravenously administered spike proteins entered the brain more readily. People who eat a plant-based, anti-inflammatory diet are more equipped to survive spike protein attacks to the brain.

Engineering coronavirus spike proteins for human experimentation and vaccine development

Naturally occurring coronaviruses were first identified in the mid-1960s. They are named after the crown-like spikes on their surface. These viruses are prevalent in animals; however, four coronaviruses are known to infect humans, including 229E, NL63, OC43, HKU1. All of these strains cause mild, cold-like symptoms in humans.

In the twenty-first century, scientists have been studying and engineering the coronavirus spike protein. Scientists can splice genes into the coronavirus spike protein, allowing natural selection to rapidly mutate the spike protein in the lab, one gene at a time. This serial passage technique hides any trace of human interference, but the advanced attachment properties of the resulting virus are a dead give-way that the virus was manipulated in a lab. This controversial gain-of-function research was banned in the US in 2004 but continued to take place in the US and abroad — as long as the research was conducted to invent new vaccines. Today, new experimental vaccines are being unleashed, as the outbreaks occur in real time.

Since coronavirus gain-of-function research began, three new coronaviruses have emerged, causing severe illness in humans. SARS-CoV-1 was first identified in China in 2003; MERS-CoV was first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012; and today’s SARS-CoV-2, was first identified in Wuhan, nearby the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

Beijing researchers affiliated with the Academy of Military Medical Science published a study in June 2020, explaining the methods they used to modify coronavirus spike proteins to exploit human lung cells. The researchers equipped mice with the ACE2 receptor from human lung cells. By exploiting the ACE2 receptor, the spike protein is engineered to attack the brain and lungs of humans. The damage of this laboratory-leak vaccine experiment will only continue as new vaccine experiments go live on the population, translating spike proteins in human cells and attacking human brains into the unforeseeable future.

AcuteShield Vanquish® ingredients inhibit mRNA Spike Proteins from attaching to body organ cells (heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, liver, ovaries, etc.), some can cross the blood brain barrier to protect the brain and central nervous system, and some can penetrate cell membranes to inhibit spike protein replication. https://acuteshield.com

Citation

(Johnson, 2021). News Target: Spike proteins administered intravenously are engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier, can cause cerebral hemorrhage. Retrieved on 12/11/22 online from https://newstarget.com/2021-06-03-spike-proteins-engineered-to-cross-blood-brain-barrier.html

07/Dec/22

Blood clots in the brain cause strokes and blood clots in the heart cause heart attacks.

DR. CHARLES HOFFE: What causes small blood clots?
Dr. Charles Hoffe found 62% percent of patients who received COVID mRNA jab test positive for blood clots…’The concern…is those people will probably all develop right-sided heart failure within three years and die because they now have increased vascular resistance through their lungs.

A Canadian doctor demands further study into the link between Covid-19 vaccines and blood clots after his research found clots in a majority of vaccinated patients, some of whom he says could be dead within three years. During a Zoom meeting with other medical professionals, Dr. Charles Hoffe explained he’s been running a study on recently vaccinated patients, having them take D-dimer blood tests to determine whether they have blood clots.

“So far I’ve got 62 percent positive elevated D-dimer, which means that the blood clots are not rare,” Hoffe informed fellow physicians. “That’s what the so-called experts keep telling us: ‘The clots are rare.’ The big ones are rare, but the small ones are clearly happening in the majority of people, 62 percent.”

Dr. Hoffe says the clots, which could number in the thousands and are hard to detect due to their microscopic size, are caused by messenger RNA molecules in the vaccine which cause spike proteins to form, which in turn attach to the cell walls of a cell impeding blood flow and damaging blood vessels.

So normally the cells that surround your blood vessels have to be very, very smooth to enable good and unimpeded flow of blood, but as soon as you’ve got all these little spike proteins that become part of the cell wall it’s now a rough surface. It’s going to be like a very coarse sandpaper. It’s now what the platelets are going to interpret as a damaged vessel. It’s no longer smooth. It’s rough. So clotting is inevitable because the platelets that come down that vessel are going to hit a rough spot and assume this must be a damaged vessel.

This vessel needs to be blocked to stop the bleeding. That’s how our clotting works. So… because of this and because of the nature of this, clots are inevitable, because of these spike proteins in the capillary networks.

DR. RYAN COLE: Spike Protein in Covid Shots Can Cause Serious Damage to Arteries.
Dr. Ryan Cole has warned that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines can cause serious damage to arteries.

The pathologist and CEO of Idaho-based Cole Diagnostics (Dr. Ryan Cole) issued this warning during an appearance on “Ask Dr. Drew.” He told program host Dr. Drew Pinsky that the spike protein expresses itself in brain tissue, major organs and other areas of the body “wherever the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) distributes,” even including slides to back up his explanation.

“It does get through the blood-brain barrier,” said Cole, pertaining to the LNP. “We know the spike protein gets through as well. So it’ll follow the small capillaries and leak into whatever tissue it wants to.”

The pathologist then presented additional slides that showed SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins accumulating in the aorta, the heart’s main artery.

“This is something that is unusual. Usually, you’ll see this in genetic conditions where the aorta ruptures,” he pointed out. “That spike protein [is] literally causing the lymphocytes to chew a hole in the aorta. This is the biggest blood vessel in your body, coming off your heart. When that ruptures, you’re gone in minutes.” (Tomey, 2022).

DR. HENRY EALY: Blood Clots and how to prevent & treat them.

Blood clots form when red blood cells stick together and block a vein or artery.
Enzymes break apart red blood cells. Blood clots form due to too much sugar, cholesterol, and spike proteins.
Lack of oxygen in mitochondria causes lack of energy production and lower levels of enzymes that break apart red blood cells.
Blood clots in the brain cause strokes and blood clots in the heart cause heart attacks.

DR. HENRY EALY RECOMMENDS TAKING THESE NUTRACEUTICALS EVERY DAY:

Vitamin E – helps keep red blood cells from sticking together.
Turmeric – helps keep red blood cells from sticking together. It lowers the thickness of blood and separates the red blood cells.
Serrapeptase – helps dissolve plaque in your arteries or dissolve blood clots that may lead to stroke or heart attack.
Bromelain – inhibits the ability of blood platelets to stick or clump together (aggregation). This may help reduce clot formation and cardiovascular events.
Green Tea – is medicinal water and should be consumed daily.

SUPPORTING HEALTHY RED BLOOD CELLS:
AcuteShield Vanquish® ingredients that have been shown to reduce blood clotting include Turmeric (Curcumin), Bromelain (recommended by Dr. Henry Ealy in the text above), Quercetin, Nigella Sativa, Thymoquinone, N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC), Pyrroloquinoline Quinone (PQQ), Alpha Lipoic Acid, Magnesium, and Astaxanthin.

AcuteShield Vanquish® Ingredients that have been shown to inhibit COVID Spike Proteins and mRNA Vaccine Spike Proteins from attaching to the cell walls of a cell impeding blood flow and damaging blood vessels (referred to by Dr. Charles Hoffe in the text above) are Vitamin D3 Cholecalciferol, Quercetin Dihydrate, Nigellin Sativa, Thymoquinone, N-acetylcysteine, Sulforaphane, Zinc Monomethionine, Curcumin, Glutathione, and Bromelain.

Citations:

(Salazar, 2021). Austin Texas Gov: Shock: Doctor Warns That Majority Of Vaccinated Patients Could Have Permanent Heart Damage, Some May Die Within Three Years. Retrieved on 12/10/22 online from https://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=364941

(Tomey, 2022). Citizens News: Spike Protein in Covid Shots Can Cause Serious Damage to Arteries. Retrieved on 12/10/22 online at https://citizens.news/681622.html

(Ealy, 2022). EnergizedHealth.com: Recommends taking these nutraceuticals every day. Retrieved on 12/10/22 online from https://energizedhealth.com

Plant Meds RX Inc/AcuteShield Inc do not warrant that these ingredients in their products will prevent or treat blood clots. We offer statements by doctors and research by scientist that demonstrate the potential for supporting healthy red blood cells.

“These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”

29/Nov/22

11/28/2022 / By Olivia Cook

A study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revealed that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines increase the risk of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) by 13,200 percent.

It examined the effects of vaccination using the mRNA COVID-19 injections from Pfizer and Moderna, based on the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The cases were then cross-checked to match the CDC’s definition of myocarditis. A total of 1,626 cases of myocarditis had been examined.

According to CDC researchers, 105.9 myocarditis cases per million doses were recorded in the 16- to 17-year-old male cohort injected with the second dose. The 12- to 15-year-old male cohort, meanwhile, recorded 70.7 myocarditis cases per million doses following the second vaccine shot. Moreover, the 18- to 24-year-old male cohort also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both the Pfizer (52.4 cases per million) and Moderna (56.3 cases per million) vaccines. (Related: Large Nordic study finds that mRNA COVID vaccines increase risk of myocarditis.)

The study authors ultimately concluded that the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines should be considered in the context of the supposed “benefits” of vaccination.

The public health agency, however, has doubled down on its insistence that adverse reactions after vaccination are rare.

“COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, and severe reactions after vaccination are rare,” said the CDC. “Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination responded well to medication and rest and felt better quickly”.

The agency also pointed out that “reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare,” and that “reports of adverse events, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.”

McCullough: Post-vaccination reports of myocarditis are far from rare
Texas-based cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, however, disagreed with the notion of myocarditis being a “rare” adverse event.

“In cardiology, we spend our entire career trying to save every bit of heart muscle. We put in stents, we do heart catheterization, we do stress tests, we do CT angiograms. The whole game of cardiology is to preserve heart muscle,” McCullough said in a statement to the Epoch Times.

“Under no circumstances would we accept a vaccine that causes even one person to sustain heart damage. Not one. And this idea that ‘Oh, we’re going to ask a large number of people to sustain heart damage for some other theoretical benefit for a viral infection,’ which for most is less than a common cold, is untenable. The benefits of the vaccines in no way outweigh the risks.”

Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has started active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available.

Meanwhile, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology have advised that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after a normal ECG and other test results are obtained. They have also advised that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.

Watch Dr. Peter McCullough explain how the mRNA COVID-19 injections cause myocarditis below:

23/Nov/22

OUTRAGEOUS! FDA BACKTRACKS DURING TRIAL AND NOW CLAIMS ‘NOT TAKING IVERMECTIN FOR COVID-19’ WAS MERELY A RECOMMENDATION

In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin that “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.

This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015 and the drug was praised in several scientific journals.

FDA SCARES OFF AMERICANS FROM TAKING “HORSE DRUG” IVERMECTIN FOR COVID — BUT PUSHED THE DRUG ON AFRICAN MIGRANTS IN 2015

There have been over 93 scientific studies on Ivermectin that showed significant benefits in treating COVID-19 in its early stages. The science is undeniable.

Despite this the US government condemned its use for COVID-19.

Fast forward to today…

During a recent hearing, government lawyers argued that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was only giving advice and it was not mandatory when it told people to “stop” taking Ivermectin for COVID-19.

The Nov. 1 hearing in federal court in Texas was for a complaint made by three doctors who claim the FDA’s statements on ivermectin, an anti-parasitic that has shown positive benefits in some trials against COVID-19, violated their constitutional right to practice medicine, Epoch Times reported.

“The cited statements were not directives,” said Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers. “They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”

“They use informal language, that is true… It’s conversational but not mandatory,” he continued.

The FDA has approved Ivermectin for use in other vector-borne diseases, but not for COVID-19. The Food and Drug Administration warned the public via its Twitter account that Ivermectin is only safe for use in horses but not for human intake against Covid-19.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the caption reads.

A second post stated: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

The lawsuit claims that FDA actions violated the law by interfering with the doctors’ ability to practice medicine and used the wonder drug “Ivermectin” against Covid-19.

It asked the court to declare the FDA’s actions unlawful and prevent the agency from issuing directives or opinions on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

The three plaintiffs in the case are Dr. Paul Marik of Virginia, Dr. Mary Bowden of Texas, and Dr. Robert Apter of Arizona.

“Can you understand the toll that that takes that I have young patients – young patients in the 30s and 40s, who I had to watch die – while the hospital prevented me from giving them the treatment I thought was in their best interest,” says Dr. Marik in 2021.

Houston Methodist health officials began investigating and suspended Dr. Mary Bowden last year for spreading “dangerous misinformation” about Covid-19 and promoting the efficacy of ivermectin, all because of FDA’s opinion.

The Nobel prize-winning, anti-parasitic drug, which has been deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases, is far safer than the potentially lethal, experimental Covid vaccines, the Texas doctor argued.

Dr. Meryl Nass, a Maine doctor with more than 40 years of experience cannot practice after her medical license was suspended for ‘spreading Covid misinformation’ and treating Covid patients with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.

Dr. Meryl Nass was also ordered to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation because of her action, all because of FDA’s opinion on Ivermectin and HCQ.

Ivermectin was first identified in the 1970s during a veterinary drug screening project at Merck Pharmaceuticals and has been used since then without any adverse events.

For almost three years, The Gateway Pundit has been reporting about the efficacy of Ivermectin and HCQ in treating COVID-19.

There have now been 187 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, 138 peer-reviewed, and 93 comparing treatment and control groups that show a 62% improvement for early treatment in COVID patients. Ivermectin was adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations).

A citywide prevention program using ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina between July 2020 and December 2020.

According to this comprehensive study, the regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates. The ivermectin non-users were two times more likely to die of COVID-19 than ivermectin users in the overall population analysis.

Earlier this year, Project Veritas released never before seen military documents regarding the origins of Covid-19, gain-of-function research, vaccines, potential treatments, and the government’s effort to conceal everything.

The documents contained evidence that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were effective in treating the coronavirus. This information was hidden from the American public.

Hal Turner Show reported:

DOCUMENTS STORED ON A TOP SECRET FOLDER ON THE COMPUTERS OF THE DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY (DARPA) PROVE THAT THE MEDICINES IVERMECTIN, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND INTERFERON WERE PROVEN “CURATIVE” OF COVID-19 IN APRIL 2020 – THE CURES WERE BURIED AS “TOP SECRET.”

THE REVELATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, SNEAKILY STORED IN A TOP SECRET FOLDER ON GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS PROVE THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES KNEW IN APRIL, 2020, THE ENTIRE “COVID-19 PANDEMIC” WAS COMPLETELY CURABLE THROUGH THE USE OF THESE COMMON MEDICATIONS.

HERE ARE EXCERPTS.

Heads should roll over this disclosure. (Survival, 2022).

LAWSUIT TO STOP RETALIATION BY MEDICAL SPECIALTY BOARDS FILED BY AAPS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation (AAPS) filed a lawsuit today in the federal Southern District of Texas, against three medical special boards for their threatened retaliation against physicians who speak out on matters of public concern. AAPS stands up for First Amendment rights of physicians who, like all American citizens, should be able to speak publicly without risk of retaliation.

“Our freedoms depend on the ability of physicians and all Americans to speak out on important issues of our day,” said Andrew Schlafly, who filed this lawsuit. “Entities holding monopolies over board certification should not be retaliating against good physicians.”

This new lawsuit asserts that “Defendants wrongly misuse their authority in a politically partisan manner to chill speech critical of positions taken by Dr. Anthony Fauci, lockdowns, mask mandates, Covid vaccines and even abortion.” This Complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief against several specialty Board Defendants that hold monopolies over board certification, and against the federal government for its newly created Disinformation Governance Board.

“Although only official state medical boards have the proper authority to regulate the practice of medicine, certifications by the Board Defendants constitute a de facto essential credential for practicing in most hospitals or participating in most networks,” this lawsuit asserts. “By threatening to revoke board certification of physicians, the Board Defendants improperly chill speech by physicians without the political accountability of official state medical boards,” this Complaint adds.

The Board Defendants are the American Board of Internal Medicine, the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and the American Board of Family Medicine. Each of these entities, which hold monopolies over board certification in their specialties, have declared their plans to discipline physicians who speak out.

“Criticizing Dr. Anthony Fauci should not be a basis for retaliating against a physician for speaking his mind,” Andrew Schlafly states. The lawsuit points out that many Republican senators properly rebuked Dr. Fauci for his statements that “I represent science” and that those who criticize him “are really criticizing science.” The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation is a national organization that co-sponsors conferences and funds scholarships for attendance by medical students and residents. (AAPS, 2022).

THE FDA MISLED THE PUBLIC ABOUT IVERMECTIN AND SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE IN COURT, ARGUES THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS (AAPS)

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
September 30, 2022
TUCSON, Ariz., Sept. 30, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its motion and amicus brief Thursday evening with the federal district court in Galveston urging it to allow the lawsuit to proceed against the FDA for its misleading statements against ivermectin. In Apter v. HHS, a group of physicians sued to hold the Food and Drug Administration, a federal agency within the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), accountable for its interference with physicians’ ability to treat Covid-19.

“Defendant FDA has improperly exploited misunderstandings about the legality and prevalence of off-label uses of medication, in order to mislead courts, state medical boards, and the public into thinking there is anything improper about off-label prescribing,” AAPS writes in its amicus brief to the court. “Not only is off-label prescribing fully proper, legal, and commonplace, but it is also absolutely necessary in order to give effective care to patients.”

Yet the FDA published multiple statements and sent letters to influential organizations to falsely disparage ivermectin, implying that it was not approved for treating Covid-19. Many, including courts and state medical boards, were misled by the FDA into thinking that its lack of approval for this treatment meant that ivermectin should not be used to treat Covid-19.

“It has never been proper for the FDA to interfere with that essential part of the practice of medicine, and the FDA knows it,” AAPS informed the court. The FDA “insisted and continues to insist on interfering with the prescription of this safe medication by physicians in treating Covid-19,” AAPS added.

AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly pointed out to the court that the FDA “has engaged in a campaign of interference with the proper use by physicians of ivermectin, which has long been approved as fully safe for human use.” He alerted the court that once the FDA approves a medication as safe, then physicians have full authority to prescribe it to treat any illness, particularly a novel virus like Covid-19.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto (everything for the patient). (Orient, 2022).

CITATIONS
(Survival, 2022). Survival Magazine: Outrageous! FDA Backtracks During Trial and Now Claims ‘Not Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19’ was Merely a Recommendation. Retrieved on 11/23/22 online from https://survivalmagazine.org/news/outrageous-fda-backtracks-during-trial-and-now-claims-not-taking-ivermectin-for-covid-19-was-merely-a-recommendation/

(AAPS, 2022). Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation: Lawsuit to Stop Retaliation by Medical Specialty Boards Filed by AAPS Educational Foundation. Retrieved on 11/23/22 online from https://aapsonline.org/lawsuit-to-stop-retaliation-by-medical-specialty-boards-filed-by-aaps/

(Orient, 2022). Yahoo: Outrageous! FDA Backtracks During Trial and Now Claims ‘Not Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19’ was Merely a Recommendation – Survival Magazine & News – Bushcraft Prepper Offgrid SHTF Blog & Conservative News. Retrieved on 11/23/22 online from https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/fda-misled-public-ivermectin-accountable-144900899.html

Newer Posts

Older Posts

Blog: COVID & mRNA Vaccine News

SPIKE PROTEINS ADMINISTERED INTRAVENOUSLY ARE ENGINEERED TO CROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER, CAN CAUSE CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE

DOCTOR FINDS 62% PERCENT OF PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED COVID MRNA JAB TEST POSITIVE FOR BLOOD CLOTS

Blood clots in the brain cause strokes and blood clots in the heart cause heart attacks.

CDC STUDY: COVID-19 MRNA SHOTS INCREASE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS BY 13,200%

OUTRAGEOUS! FDA NOW CLAIMS ‘NOT TAKING IVERMECTIN FOR COVID-19’ WAS MERELY A RECOMMENDATION

OUTRAGEOUS! FDA BACKTRACKS DURING TRIAL AND NOW CLAIMS ‘NOT TAKING IVERMECTIN FOR COVID-19’ WAS MERELY A RECOMMENDATION

LAWSUIT TO STOP RETALIATION BY MEDICAL SPECIALTY BOARDS FILED BY AAPS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

THE FDA MISLED THE PUBLIC ABOUT IVERMECTIN AND SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE IN COURT, ARGUES THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS (AAPS)

John Plays Guitar

New Scientific Research Has Shown Ivermectin Can Treat Cancer Effectively

mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Pose Grave Public Health Risks